Sunday, August 25, 2013
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Getting to Know My International Contacts~ Part 3
Unfortunately, I was unable to connect with my international
contacts throughout this course so I have had to revert to the alternate assignment.
Therefore, I went to the Unesco website and explored its contents.
Under the quality tab I clicked on the related information
tab and read a paper on Early Childhood Workforce in Developed Countries. The
article talked about how different countries view and educate their child care
workforce. For instance in New Zealand, Spain and Sweden the teacher has
emerged as the ‘core’ profession. The new education qualifies a new profession:
teachers working with children from birth to 19 and in a range of education
settings. Teachers qualify with an individual profile which indicates in which
service and with which age group of children they are best qualified to work,
and this profile is constructed through the specializations that students opt
to take after the 18 months general course which all students follow. This
paper also discussed the wages for child care teachers and the increased costs of
having an educated workforce. The paper posed the question “Who will pay for a
properly qualified workforce?” That’s a question I would like an answer to
myself….
Under the Investment and Financing tab I learned that the
greatest difficulty faced by countries in their efforts to expand and improve
the quality of early childhood care and education is the mobilization of
resources. It discussed how in many developing countries early childhood
education is overshadowed by other pressing priorities, such as universal
primary education.
The 1990 Jomtien
Declaration on Education for All (EFA), stated that countries should view early
childhood as part of basic education. Once countries recognize the positive
value of state investment in this area, the next challenge is to mobilize
funds. In general, government funding for early childhood is extremely
small. The authors of this paper believe private sector involvement using a
market approach may also ensure services are delivered more effectively.
However, governments must use complementary financing measures to ensure equity
of access for poor and disadvantaged children, as a pure market approach to
increasing the level of early childhood provision has been shown to favor the
privileged, who can afford the service
Finally, under the access
and equity tab I read a brief on Vietnam entitled, Supporting the Poorest: Vietnam’s Early Childhood Policy. I found
this brief quite interesting regarding how the funding for early childhood is
split, between the poor and the poorest. When asked if early childhood
education should be made compulsory in an effort to receive more funding the
answer was no, and it is not an option being explored by the Government, (though
at the provincial level it has been announced as a policy, helping local
authorities boost political and investment commitments). The interviewee stated
that in Vietnam, state budgets are to be spent strictly on the poorest.
I have attached the link if
you are interested in browsing the site. Browse the News link, there are several
interesting articles to be found there as well.
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Sharing Web Resources
I have to admit, I was quite glad to see we were researching
website outside of our initial choice. I have not been impressed by the site I
initially chose. It just has not been as informative as I had
hoped.
However, the links took me to good information. I searched several
of the links, but really liked the Australian Early Childhood Association. I
signed up for their newsletter. There were several resources on their page, I
spent quite some time looking at a link called Everyday Learning Series. It
publishes short books educating the reader on many different subjects, such as
everyday learning about loss and grief, being green, bullying, social emotional
learning etc. They also had a link to mychild.gov.au., which I had already
signed up for during the first week of this course. I received their newsletter
last week; and as I read through it today, I realized it was right on target
with what we are studying this week. This article discussed how Australia has two
programs to help families cover the expenses of child care. The first is based
on income and is called the Child Care Benefit it is targeted to low-income
families. To be eligible for the Child Care Benefit, you need to meet
eligibility requirements including residency, passing the Work, Training, Study
Test and immunization. The second programs is the Child Care Rebate. The Child
Care Rebate is not income-tested and provides assistance for families using
approved child care for work, training, or study related reasons. So, even if the
family income is too high to receive the Child Care Benefit, a family may be
eligible for the Child Care Rebate. I think this is a really great idea as many
families in the U.S. do not qualify for the subsidy, but certainly do not make
enough money to pay child care expenses.
I have listed the links available on the NAECTE website.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education
American Associate Degree Early Childhood Educators
Association for Childhood Education International
Association of Teacher Educators
Certification Map
Council of Exceptional Children, Division of Early Childhood
Education Commission of the States, Report on State Statutes on
Kindergarten
High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
National Association for the Education of Young Children
National Board of Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS)
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)
OMEP-U.S. National Committee (a unit of World Organization for
Early Childhood Education)
University of Kentucky page
Thematic Network Teacher Education in Europe
Australian Early Childhood Association
Canadian Association of Early Childhood Educators
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Getting to Know My International Contacts - Part 2
I have still not had any response from anyone that I have
contacted through this assignment. I am
really disappointed but am moving on with the alternate assignment. Since I have not made contact I am continuing
the alternate assignment of listening to podcasts and browsing the Harvard
University's "Global Children's Initiative" website. Here's some insight from this week:
Podcasts: I chose to
listen to the podcast by Barnabus O’Talla, the Dean of Education at Martyr’s University
in Uganda. He spoke about a child in his village who was HIV positive. The
parents were afraid to tell the village as they feared the village would
despise them. But, Mr. O’Talla recommended they take the child to a doctor. The
parents took the child to the doctor and the parents listened to what the
doctor had to say. The doctor gave the child ARVs and the parents took the
child home and followed the doctor’s instructions-every bit of the
instructions. Mr. O’Talla was happy he was able to partner with the parents and
the doctor for the child’s best possible outcome. He said sometimes the “normal
teacher” might not be the right one. He feels it is important for those
involved with a child to partner and find the best ways to help the child.
The Harvard University website is full of information and
links to initiatives dedicated to improving equity and excellence around the
globe. In the tab Global Children’s
Initiative I found an article on Applying the Science of Early Childhood in
Brazil - The project describes Nucleo Clencia Pela Infancia, which is a program
dedicated to improving the lives of young children and their families in Brazil
by utilizing the science of child health and development and connecting the
information to better policies; and strengthening leadership around early
childhood development through an executive leadership course for policymakers.
That’s a great idea!!
The National Forum on Early Childhood Policy and Programs is
a direct outgrowth of another Center initiative, the National Scientific
Council on the Developing Child. The Forum was established to complement the
Council’s work, which aims to explain why public investments should be made in
the early childhood years. The Forum attempts to answer what those investments
should be and how they should be made, and, to that end, it assesses and
interprets program evaluation research. Currently, the Forum is building a
comprehensive meta-analytic database on intervention services from the prenatal
period to age five, including assessments of early care and education, family
support and health-based programs.
Under the Students, Education and Leadership Development tab
I found information on a lecture series which is open to all University
students, faculty, and the general public and provides a venue to interact with
distinguished scholars whose creative research has made significant advances in
the field of child development. This series spotlights these leaders’ bold
contributions to the science of child development and the implications of their
research on the worlds of education, policy, public health, medicine, justice,
and economic development. I’m looking forward to finding some extra time to check
out some of these lectures
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)